EDETOX logo

IN VIVO STUDIES FURTHER DETAILS

University of Newcastle homepage

In Vivo Study No: 296

METHODS

Chemical	Membrane	Concentration mg/ml	Concentration mg/ml	loading (mg/cm2)	Species	Site	Area (cm2)	Occluded?	Exposure Time (h)	Analytical Method
Diazinon	0.05	0.4704	0.0056	Acetone	Rat	Mid-dorsal	4.2	2	24	Radiolabelled (14C)

RESULTS

Length of Study (h)	% Recovery	+/-	Dose remaining on surface (mg)	% remaining on Surface	Dose remaining in stratum corneum (mg)	% remaining in stratum corneum	Dose remaining in the viable skin	% remaining in the viable skin	Amount Absorbed (mg)	% Absorbed	+/-	% Absorbed
336	100.2	2.97	0.0104	44.6			4.7E-05	0.2	0.013	55.1	0.96	55.1

Maximal Flux (mcrg/cm2/h)	Average Flux (mcrg/cm2/h)	+/-	Time Plasma/Blood Levels Peaked (h)	Peak Blood Concentration (mg/l)	n	kp (cm/h)	Lag Time (h)
					4

NOTES

Male Sprague-Dawley Rats were used. The dose site was protected from surface rub-off by a foam rubber non-occlusive patch. % Absorption has been calculated from the amount found in the Urine + faeces + tissue.

REFERENCE

In Vitro Dermal Absorption Of Pesticides IV. In Vivo And In Vitro Comparison with the Organophosphorus Insecticide Diazinon In Rat, Guinea Pig, Pig, Human And Tissue-Cultured Skin (1994) Toxicol. Vitro, 8 :1213-1218