EDETOX logo

IN VIVO STUDIES FURTHER DETAILS


BACK TO THE MAIN MENU

back to previous page forward to next page

University of Newcastle homepage

In Vivo Study No: 309

METHODS

ChemicalMembraneConcentration mg/mlConcentration mg/mlloading (mg/cm2)SpeciesSiteArea (cm2)Occluded?Exposure Time (h)Analytical Method
ArsenicSee Notes 0.0006SoilMonkeyAbdomen12224Radiolabelled (73As)

RESULTS

Length of Study (h)% Recovery+/-Dose remaining on surface (mg)% remaining on SurfaceDose remaining in stratum corneum (mg)% remaining in stratum corneumDose remaining in the viable skin% remaining in the viable skinAmount Absorbed (mg)% Absorbed+/-% Absorbed
168   76.6    0.000233.21.93.2
Maximal Flux (mcrg/cm2/h)Average Flux (mcrg/cm2/h)+/-Time Plasma/Blood Levels Peaked (h)Peak Blood Concentration (mg/l)nkp (cm/h)Lag Time (h)
     4  

NOTES

The soil was kept on the skin using a non-occlusive gortex and aluminium eye patches with large holes drilled into them. The soil sample came form Yolo County, California (26% sand, 26% clay, 48% silt 0.9% organic) 4.8g of soil was used. The % absorption was calculated from the amount present in the urine. This was corrected for incomplete excretion by comparing with the amount excreted after an intravenous dose.

REFERENCE

In Vivo And In Vitro Percutaneous Absorption And Skin Decontamination Of Arsenic From Water And Soil (1993) Fundam. Appl. Toxicol., 20 :336-340