EDETOX logo

IN VIVO STUDIES FURTHER DETAILS


BACK TO THE MAIN MENU

back to previous page forward to next page

University of Newcastle homepage

In Vivo Study No: 491

METHODS

ChemicalMembraneConcentration mg/mlConcentration mg/mlloading (mg/cm2)SpeciesSiteArea (cm2)Occluded?Exposure Time (h)Analytical Method
Chlorpyrifos0.25.2590.1878AcetoneRatMid-dorsal5.6272Radiolabelled (14C)

RESULTS

Length of Study (h)% Recovery+/-Dose remaining on surface (mg)% remaining on SurfaceDose remaining in stratum corneum (mg)% remaining in stratum corneumDose remaining in the viable skin% remaining in the viable skinAmount Absorbed (mg)% Absorbed+/-% Absorbed
7297.40.3      0.679564.6664.6
Maximal Flux (mcrg/cm2/h)Average Flux (mcrg/cm2/h)+/-Time Plasma/Blood Levels Peaked (h)Peak Blood Concentration (mg/l)nkp (cm/h)Lag Time (h)
     3  

NOTES

Adult female Fischer 344 Rats were used. The fur on the backs of the animals was removed with an electric animal hair clipper 24h prior to treatment. The treated area was protected by gluing a 5ml perforated plastic blister with cyanoacrylate glue. The rats were housed in metabolism cages equipped with devices for urine and faeces collection. The results were given as fractional penetration of the compound. This was found by divinding the % applied radioactivity recovered in the urine and faeces by the percentage radioactivity recovered. I have multiplied this back up to give the actual % recovered in the urine and faeces. The results were also gived +/- SEM. I have converted this to SD for the purpose of this database.

REFERENCE

Comparison Of The Penetration Of 14 Pesticides Through The Skin Of Young And Adult Rats (1987) J. Toxicol. Environ. Health, 21 :353-366